How long will you live? This exercise test may have the answer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.Read more

A new study has shown how a simple exercise could predict natural and cardiovascular causes of death.

Researchers wanted to see whether non-aerobic physical fitness, assessed by a sitting-rising test, could predict premature deaths in middle-aged and older people, and on Wednesday, their results were published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

They tested the theory on 4,282 adults aged 46-75 years from 1998 to 2023. Most of the participants, 68 percent, were men. “None of them presented relevant physical or clinical limitations for fitness testing,” researchers said.

All of the participants performed a sitting-rising test to evaluate the main components of non-aerobic physical fitness, which are muscle strength/power, flexibility, balance and body composition.

open image in gallery

A new study has shown how a simple exercise could predict natural and cardiovascular causes of death (Getty Images)

The test was simple, yet not necessarily easy. Participants had to sit and rise from the floor without other body parts such as hands, elbows or knees touching the floor.

Their instructions were as follows: “’Without worrying about the speed of movement, try to sit and then rise from the floor, using the minimum support that you believe is needed,’” the study’s authors wrote.

If participants used any extremities for support, they’d lose points. They also needed to steady themselves as a perceived partial loss of balance would knock down their score.

Researchers found that non-aerobic physical fitness “was a significant predictor” of natural and cardiovascular mortality in the participants.

After following up with patients about 12 years later, researchers found there were 665 deaths due to natural causes.

Those who scored a perfect 10 points on the sitting-rising test had death rates of 3.7 percent. Death rates tripled to 11.1 percent for people with a score of 8 points and “dramatically increased” by 42.1 percent for those with a score of 0 to 4 points, according to researchers.

The study was done at a private clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and most of the participants “belonged to upper socioeconomic and education strata of the country.”

Researchers were also unable to control past or current levels of physical activity and exercise.

No Byline Policy

Editorial Guidelines

Corrections Policy

Source